↓ Skip to main content

Remote Sensing for Water Resources and Hydrology

Overview of attention for book
Remote Sensing for Water Resources and Hydrology
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
Title
Remote Sensing for Water Resources and Hydrology
Published by
The National Academies Press, January 1980
DOI 10.17226/20616
ISBNs
978-0-309-34630-6, 978-0-309-34631-3
Authors

Panel on Water Resources; Space Applications Board; Assembly of Engineering; National Research Council, National Research Council

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,442,018
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#4,059
of 9,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,510
of 28,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#16
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.