↓ Skip to main content

Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program
Published by
The National Academies Press, March 1997
DOI 10.17226/5557
ISBNs
978-0-309-05730-1, 978-0-309-56162-4, 978-0-309-17489-3, 978-0-309-20670-9
Authors

Committee on Building an Environmental Management Science Program, National Research Council

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#4,655
of 9,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,469
of 30,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.