↓ Skip to main content

Summary of Forum II Proceedings, March 7-8, 1972, Washington, D.C

Overview of attention for book
Summary of Forum II Proceedings, March 7-8, 1972, Washington, D.C
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
Title
Summary of Forum II Proceedings, March 7-8, 1972, Washington, D.C
Published by
The National Academies Press, January 1972
DOI 10.17226/20508
ISBNs
978-0-309-34428-9, 978-0-309-34429-6
Authors

Committee on Power Plant Siting; National Academy of Engineering

Timeline
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1972.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#4,655
of 9,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,219
of 16,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.