↓ Skip to main content

Research and Applications Needs in Flood Hydrology Science

Overview of attention for book
Research and Applications Needs in Flood Hydrology Science
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Research and Applications Needs in Flood Hydrology Science
Published by
The National Academies Press, February 2009
DOI 10.17226/12606
ISBNs
978-0-309-13248-0, 978-0-309-13649-5, 978-0-309-13650-1
Authors

William S. Logan and Laura J. Helsabeck; Planning Committee on Research Applications Needs in Flood Hydrology Science: A Workshop; Water Science and Technology Board; Board on Earth and Life Studies; National Research Council

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 20%
Pakistan 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 30%
Philosophy 1 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#4,655
of 9,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,138
of 94,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#33
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.