↓ Skip to main content

Clothing Test Methods, Edited by L.H. Newburgh (Physiological Tests) and Milton Harris (Physical Tests) of Subcommittee on Clothing of the National Research Council (U.S.A.)

Overview of attention for book
Clothing Test Methods, Edited by L.H. Newburgh (Physiological Tests) and Milton Harris (Physical…
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Clothing Test Methods, Edited by L.H. Newburgh (Physiological Tests) and Milton Harris (Physical Tests) of Subcommittee on Clothing of the National Research Council (U.S.A.)
Published by
The National Academies Press, January 1945
DOI 10.17226/18651
ISBNs
978-0-309-29954-1, 978-0-309-29955-8
Authors

L. H. Newburgh and Milton Harris, Editors; Subcommittee on Clothing; National Research Council

Timeline
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1945.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#4,655
of 9,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113
of 2,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them