| Title |
Asbestos
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.17226/11665 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-10169-1, 978-0-309-65952-9, 978-0-309-65953-6
|
| Authors |
Committee on Asbestos: Selected Health Effects; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practices; Institute of Medicine |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2024.
All research outputs
#332,505
of 27,533,884 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#605
of 10,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#483
of 99,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#4
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,533,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
