| Title |
Risk and Innovation
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, November 1995
|
| DOI | 10.17226/5024 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-05376-1, 978-0-309-56787-9, 978-0-309-17604-0, 978-0-309-20790-4
|
| Authors |
National Academy of Engineering |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,638,927
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#2,941
of 10,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,435
of 81,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.