| Title |
Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.17226/26894 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-71169-2, 978-0-309-70042-9, 978-0-309-71170-8, 978-0-309-71171-5
|
| Authors |
Committee on Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins; Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics; Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academy of Engineering; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 60% |
| India | 2 | 10% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 28 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 31 | 25% |
| Engineering | 24 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2025.
All research outputs
#382,590
of 28,164,253 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#674
of 10,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,554
of 419,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,164,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.