| Title |
Chemical TerrorismAssessment of U.S. Strategies in the Era of Great Power Competition
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.17226/27159 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-70678-0, 978-0-309-70675-9, 978-0-309-72278-0
|
| Authors |
Committee on Assessing and Improving Strategies for Preventing, Countering, and Responding to Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism: Chemical Threats; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Cabo Verde | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2024.
All research outputs
#2,560,556
of 27,524,720 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#2,468
of 10,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,794
of 332,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#15
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,524,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.