↓ Skip to main content

Ending Unequal TreatmentStrategies to Achieve Equitable Health Care and Optimal Health for All

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Ending Unequal TreatmentStrategies to Achieve Equitable Health Care and Optimal Health for All'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
85 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Ending Unequal TreatmentStrategies to Achieve Equitable Health Care and Optimal Health for All
Published by
The National Academies Press, June 2024
DOI 10.17226/27820
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-0-309-72152-3, 978-0-309-72155-4, 978-0-309-72153-0, 978-0-309-72154-7
Authors

Georges C. Benjamin, Jennifer E. DeVoe, Francis K. Amankwah, and Sharyl J. Nass, Editors; Committee on Unequal Treatment Revisited: The Current State of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care; Board on Health Care Services; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Health and Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Editors

Georges C. Benjamin, Jennifer E. DeVoe, Francis K. Amankwah, Sharyl J. Nass

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 56%
Researcher 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 56%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 645. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2025.
All research outputs
#37,431
of 27,887,477 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#149
of 10,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#609
of 333,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,887,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.