| Title |
Constructing Valid Geospatial Tools for Environmental Justice
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.17226/27317 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-71200-2, 978-0-309-72571-2, 978-0-309-72572-9
|
| Authors |
Committee on Utilizing Advanced Environmental Health and Geospatial Data and Technologies to Inform Community Investment; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Board on Environmental Sciences and Toxicology; Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#803,706
of 27,510,809 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#1,112
of 10,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,128
of 305,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#10
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,510,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.