| Title |
Implications of Law, Policy, and Federal Agency Decision-Making Under a New Judicial Standard
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, June 2025
|
| DOI | 10.17226/29169 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-99417-0
|
| Authors |
Eric Olson, Steve Olson, Anne-Marie Mazza, Rapporteurs; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
| Editors |
Eric Olson, Steve Olson, Anne-Marie Mazza |
Login to access the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2025.
All research outputs
#3,862,269
of 28,978,034 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#3,091
of 10,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,104
of 284,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,978,034 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.