↓ Skip to main content

Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic Diseases - PubMed - NCBI

Overview of attention for book
Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic Diseases - PubMed - NCBI
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
18 X users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic Diseases - PubMed - NCBI
Published by
The National Academies Press, December 2009
DOI 10.17226/12625
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-0-309-13734-8, 978-0-309-14495-7, 978-0-309-13735-5, 978-0-309-13736-2, 978-0-309-14939-6, 978-0-309-14938-9
Authors

Gerald T. Keusch, Marguerite Pappaioanou, Mila C. Gonzalez, Kimberly A. Scott, and Peggy Tsai, Editors; Committee on Achieving Sustainable Global Capacity for Surveillance and Response to Emerging Diseases of Zoonotic Origin; National Research Council, Gerald T. Keusch, Marguerite Pappaioanou, Mila C. González, Kimberly A. Scott, and Peggy Tsai, Editors; Committee on Achieving Sustainable Global Capacity for Surveillance and Response to Emerging Diseases of Zoonotic Origin; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 321 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 17%
Researcher 56 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 69 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 30 9%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 6%
Other 80 24%
Unknown 79 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#277,547
of 27,910,062 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#546
of 10,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#888
of 185,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#5
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,910,062 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.