Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (CUAS) Capability for Battalion-and-Below OperationsAbbreviated…
The National Academies Press
| Title |
Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (CUAS) Capability for Battalion-and-Below OperationsAbbreviated Version of a Restricted Report
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.17226/24747 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-47235-7, 978-0-309-47236-4, 978-0-309-45813-9, 978-0-309-45814-6, 978-0-309-45815-3, 978-0-309-45816-0, 978-0-309-45817-7
|
| Authors |
Committee on Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (CUAS) Capability for Battalion-and-Below Operations; Board on Army Science and Technology; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| Serbia | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 24% |
| Engineering | 3 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#696,485
of 27,729,689 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#1,009
of 10,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,619
of 351,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#12
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,729,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.