Alternatives for the Demilitarization of Conventional Munitions
The National Academies Press
| Title |
Alternatives for the Demilitarization of Conventional Munitions
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.17226/25140 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-47732-1, 978-0-309-47730-7, 978-0-309-47731-4, 978-0-309-47733-8, 978-0-309-47734-5, 978-0-309-47736-9, 978-0-309-47735-2
|
| Authors |
Committee on Alternatives for the Demilitarization of Conventional Munitions; Board on Army Science and Technology; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | 7 | 28% |
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Mauritania | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#448,629
of 28,153,575 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#758
of 10,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,851
of 452,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#17
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,153,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.