Integrating Landscape Approaches and Multi-Resource Analysis into Natural Resource Management
The National Academies Press
| Title |
Integrating Landscape Approaches and Multi-Resource Analysis into Natural Resource Management
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.17226/21917 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-39215-0, 978-0-309-39216-7, 978-0-309-39217-4, 978-0-309-39219-8, 978-0-309-39218-1
|
| Authors |
Dominic A. Brose, Rapporteur; Committee on the Practice of Sustainability Science; Science and Technology for Sustainability Program; Policy and Global Affairs; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, , National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
| Engineering | 7 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,548,730
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#3,700
of 9,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,616
of 400,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#62
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.