↓ Skip to main content

Informing Social Security's Process for Financial Capability Determination

Overview of attention for book
Informing Social Security's Process for Financial Capability Determination
The National Academies Press
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Informing Social Security's Process for Financial Capability Determination
Published by
The National Academies Press, March 2016
DOI 10.17226/21922
ISBNs
978-0-309-39257-0, 978-0-309-39258-7, 978-0-309-39259-4, 978-0-309-39261-7, 978-0-309-39260-0
Authors

Paul S. Appelbaum, Carol Mason Spicer, and Frank R. Valliere, Editors; Committee to Evaluate the Social Security Administration's Capability Determination Process for Adult Beneficiaries; Board on the Health of Select Populations; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, , National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Editors

Paul S. Appelbaum, Carol Mason Spicer, Frank R. Valliere

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 14 34%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 15%
Social Sciences 5 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#996,694
of 26,378,208 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#1,261
of 10,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,443
of 316,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#21
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.