↓ Skip to main content

Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
645 Mendeley
Title
Preventing Bullying Through Science, Policy, and Practice
Published by
The National Academies Press, May 2016
DOI 10.17226/23482
Pubmed ID
ISBNs
978-0-309-44067-7, 978-0-309-44068-4, 978-0-309-44069-1, 978-0-309-44071-4, 978-0-309-44070-7
Authors

Frederick Rivara and Suzanne Le Menestrel, Editors; Committee on the Biological and Psychosocial Effects of Peer Victimization: Lessons for Bullying Prevention; Committee on Law and Justice; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Health and Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Frederick Rivara and Suzanne Le Menestrel, Editors; Committee on the Biological and Psychosocial Effects of Peer Victimization: Lessons for Bullying Prevention; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on Law and Justice; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Health and Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,

Editors

Frederick Rivara, Suzanne Le Menestrel

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 255 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 645 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 637 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 86 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 10%
Student > Bachelor 58 9%
Researcher 51 8%
Student > Master 46 7%
Other 145 22%
Unknown 195 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 93 14%
Psychology 86 13%
Unspecified 86 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 5%
Other 88 14%
Unknown 209 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 797. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2025.
All research outputs
#26,535
of 28,184,751 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#115
of 10,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405
of 315,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#4
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,184,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.