| Title |
Ensuring Quality and Accessible Care for Children with Disabilities and Complex Health and Educational Needs
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
The National Academies Press, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.17226/23544 |
| ISBNs |
978-0-309-44428-6
|
| Authors |
Planning Committee for the Workshop on Funding Opportunities for Evidence-Based Prevention and Interventions to Promote Children's Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Health; Forum on Promoting Children's Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Health; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,535,480
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#3,234
of 9,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,011
of 393,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#49
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
